Cohere Rerank 3.5 vs Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

Detailed comparison between Cohere Rerank 3.5 and Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual. See which reranker best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Cohere Rerank 3.5 takes the lead.

Both Cohere Rerank 3.5 and Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual are powerful reranking models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Cohere Rerank 3.5:

  • Cohere Rerank 3.5 has 68 higher ELO rating
  • Cohere Rerank 3.5 delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.689 vs 0.671)
  • Cohere Rerank 3.5 is 919ms faster on average

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Cohere Rerank 3.5

1403

Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

1335

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Cohere Rerank 3.5

37.8%

Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

37.8%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Cohere Rerank 3.5

0.689

Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

0.671

Average Latency

Response time

Cohere Rerank 3.5

492ms

Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

1411ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricCohere Rerank 3.5Jina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1403
1335
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
37.8%
37.8%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.050
$0.045
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2024-12-02
2024-06-25
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.689
0.671
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
492ms
1411ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

FiQa

MetricCohere Rerank 3.5Jina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.121
0.112
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.127
0.121
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.118
0.105
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.130
0.130
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
589ms
2294ms
Average response time
P50
603ms
1949ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
913ms
4906ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricCohere Rerank 3.5Jina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.868
0.830
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.878
0.832
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.887
0.871
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.906
0.876
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
638ms
1123ms
Average response time
P50
612ms
1015ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
819ms
1285ms
90th percentile

PG

MetricCohere Rerank 3.5Jina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
661ms
994ms
Average response time
P50
613ms
839ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
792ms
1436ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricCohere Rerank 3.5Jina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
395ms
2191ms
Average response time
P50
324ms
1237ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
570ms
5520ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricCohere Rerank 3.5Jina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.990
0.985
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.990
0.985
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
1.000
1.000
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
1.000
1.000
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
317ms
1100ms
Average response time
P50
299ms
1023ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
320ms
1642ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricCohere Rerank 3.5Jina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.691
0.677
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.760
0.744
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.063
0.064
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.107
0.106
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
355ms
763ms
Average response time
P50
305ms
796ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
523ms
1021ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more rerankers

See how all reranking models stack up. Compare Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, ZeRank, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect reranker for your RAG application.