Zerank 1 vs Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite

Detailed comparison between Zerank 1 and Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite. See which reranker best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Zerank 1 takes the lead.

Both Zerank 1 and Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite are powerful reranking models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Zerank 1:

  • Zerank 1 has 132 higher ELO rating
  • Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite is 519ms faster on average
  • Zerank 1 has a 12.5% higher win rate

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Zerank 1

1642

Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite

1510

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Zerank 1

62.9%

Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite

50.4%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Zerank 1

0.676

Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite

0.679

Average Latency

Response time

Zerank 1

1126ms

Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite

607ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricZerank 1Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 LiteDescription
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1642
1510
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
62.9%
50.4%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.025
$0.020
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2025-07-10
2025-08-11
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.676
0.679
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
1126ms
607ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

FiQa

MetricZerank 1Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 LiteDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.115
0.111
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.121
0.122
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.105
0.103
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.125
0.135
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
995ms
686ms
Average response time
P50
992ms
611ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
1124ms
829ms
90th percentile

PG

MetricZerank 1Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 LiteDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
1238ms
637ms
Average response time
P50
1217ms
614ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
1316ms
817ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricZerank 1Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 LiteDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
1072ms
580ms
Average response time
P50
1070ms
607ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
1273ms
816ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricZerank 1Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 LiteDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.967
0.981
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.971
0.983
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.987
0.993
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.993
1.000
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
1005ms
542ms
Average response time
P50
993ms
611ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
1071ms
635ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricZerank 1Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 LiteDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.715
0.692
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.747
0.763
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.064
0.064
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.103
0.111
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
1085ms
555ms
Average response time
P50
1036ms
605ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
1243ms
664ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more rerankers

See how all reranking models stack up. Compare Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, ZeRank, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect reranker for your RAG application.