Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 vs Cohere Embed v3

Detailed comparison between Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 and Cohere Embed v3. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 takes the lead.

Both Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 and Cohere Embed v3 are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Cohere Embed Multilingual v3:

  • Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 has 12 higher ELO rating
  • Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.781 vs 0.686)
  • Cohere Embed v3 is 1175ms faster on average

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

1501

Cohere Embed v3

1488

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

42.9%

Cohere Embed v3

41.0%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

0.781

Cohere Embed v3

0.686

Average Latency

Response time

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

24024ms

Cohere Embed v3

22849ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Cohere Embed v3Description
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1501
1488
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
42.9%
41.0%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.100
$0.100
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2024-02-07
2024-02-07
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.781
0.686
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
24024ms
22849ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

PG

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Cohere Embed v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
37785ms
35998ms
Average response time
P50
37029ms
35278ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
43453ms
41398ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Cohere Embed v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
5204ms
4704ms
Average response time
P50
5100ms
4610ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
5985ms
5410ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Cohere Embed v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.619
0.634
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.591
0.619
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.222
0.219
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.329
0.353
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
33570ms
30356ms
Average response time
P50
32899ms
29749ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
38606ms
34909ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Cohere Embed v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.637
0.641
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.654
0.650
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.621
0.639
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.692
0.678
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
37581ms
33241ms
Average response time
P50
36829ms
32576ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
43218ms
38227ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Cohere Embed v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.723
0.729
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.732
0.769
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.808
0.788
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.833
0.900
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
39542ms
41205ms
Average response time
P50
38751ms
40381ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
45473ms
47386ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Cohere Embed v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.996
1.000
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.994
0.996
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.122
0.123
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.218
0.218
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
32380ms
30494ms
Average response time
P50
31732ms
29884ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
37237ms
35068ms
90th percentile

NorQuAD

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Cohere Embed v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
3824ms
3703ms
Average response time
P50
3748ms
3629ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
4398ms
4258ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Cohere Embed v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.925
0.349
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.933
0.398
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.940
0.380
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.960
0.520
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
2305ms
3093ms
Average response time
P50
2259ms
3031ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
2651ms
3557ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.