Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 vs Qwen3 Embedding 4B

Detailed comparison between Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 and Qwen3 Embedding 4B. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs. If you want to compare these models on your data, try Agentset.

Model Comparison

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 takes the lead.

Both Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 and Qwen3 Embedding 4B are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Cohere Embed Multilingual v3:

  • Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 has 30 higher ELO rating

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

1512

Qwen3 Embedding 4B

1482

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

48.4%

Qwen3 Embedding 4B

44.6%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

0.701

Qwen3 Embedding 4B

0.705

Average Latency

Response time

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

7ms

Qwen3 Embedding 4B

29ms

Embedding Models Are Just One Piece of RAG

Agentset gives you a managed RAG pipeline with the top-ranked models and best practices baked in. No infrastructure to maintain, no embeddings to manage.

Trusted by teams building production RAG applications

5M+
Documents
1,500+
Teams
99.9%
Uptime

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1512
1482
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
48.4%
44.6%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.100
$0.020
Cost per million tokens processed
Dimensions
512
2560
Vector embedding dimensions (lower is more efficient)
Release Date
2024-02-07
2025-06-06
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.701
0.705
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
7ms
29ms
Average response time across all datasets

Build RAG in Minutes, Not Months

Agentset gives you a complete RAG API with top-ranked embedding models and smart retrieval built in. Upload your data, call the API, and get accurate results from day one.

import { Agentset } from "agentset";

const agentset = new Agentset();
const ns = agentset.namespace("ns_1234");

const results = await ns.search(
  "What is multi-head attention?"
);

for (const result of results) {
  console.log(result.text);
}

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

business reports

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.000
0.000
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.000
0.000
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.000
0.000
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.000
0.000
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
8ms
29ms
Average response time
P50
8ms
29ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
8ms
29ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.786
0.799
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.783
0.787
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.061
0.061
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.122
0.119
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
7ms
26ms
Average response time
P50
7ms
26ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
7ms
26ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.804
0.838
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.812
0.836
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.624
0.719
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.696
0.839
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
7ms
23ms
Average response time
P50
7ms
23ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
7ms
23ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.696
0.666
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.702
0.697
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.804
0.782
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.830
0.891
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
7ms
38ms
Average response time
P50
7ms
38ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
7ms
38ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.952
0.974
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.941
0.954
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.121
0.124
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.218
0.224
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
8ms
31ms
Average response time
P50
8ms
31ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
8ms
31ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.868
0.857
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.875
0.864
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.940
0.940
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.960
0.960
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
7ms
25ms
Average response time
P50
7ms
25ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
7ms
25ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.