Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 vs Qwen3 Embedding 4B

Detailed comparison between Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 and Qwen3 Embedding 4B. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Qwen3 Embedding 4B takes the lead.

Both Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 and Qwen3 Embedding 4B are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Qwen3 Embedding 4B:

  • Qwen3 Embedding 4B delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.802 vs 0.781)
  • Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 is 55997ms faster on average

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

1501

Qwen3 Embedding 4B

1496

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

42.9%

Qwen3 Embedding 4B

41.1%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

0.781

Qwen3 Embedding 4B

0.802

Average Latency

Response time

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

24024ms

Qwen3 Embedding 4B

80021ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1501
1496
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
42.9%
41.1%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.100
$0.020
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2024-02-07
2025-06-06
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.781
0.802
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
24024ms
80021ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

PG

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
37785ms
107349ms
Average response time
P50
37029ms
105202ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
43453ms
123451ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
5204ms
26100ms
Average response time
P50
5100ms
25578ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
5985ms
30015ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.619
0.603
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.591
0.595
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.222
0.234
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.329
0.375
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
33570ms
106747ms
Average response time
P50
32899ms
104612ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
38606ms
122759ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.637
0.724
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.654
0.759
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.621
0.715
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.692
0.835
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
37581ms
120137ms
Average response time
P50
36829ms
117734ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
43218ms
138158ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.723
0.695
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.732
0.733
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.808
0.787
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.833
0.893
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
39542ms
143712ms
Average response time
P50
38751ms
140838ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
45473ms
165269ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.996
1.000
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.994
1.000
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.122
0.123
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.218
0.224
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
32380ms
112945ms
Average response time
P50
31732ms
110686ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
37237ms
129887ms
90th percentile

NorQuAD

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
3824ms
13597ms
Average response time
P50
3748ms
13325ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
4398ms
15637ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Qwen3 Embedding 4BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.925
0.915
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.933
0.922
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.940
0.940
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.960
0.960
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
2305ms
9581ms
Average response time
P50
2259ms
9389ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
2651ms
11018ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.