Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 vs Voyage 3 Large

Detailed comparison between Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 and Voyage 3 Large. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Voyage 3 Large takes the lead.

Both Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 and Voyage 3 Large are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Voyage 3 Large:

  • Voyage 3 Large has 28 higher ELO rating
  • Voyage 3 Large delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.837 vs 0.781)
  • Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 is 39453ms faster on average
  • Voyage 3 Large has a 9.7% higher win rate

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

1501

Voyage 3 Large

1528

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

42.9%

Voyage 3 Large

52.6%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

0.781

Voyage 3 Large

0.837

Average Latency

Response time

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

24024ms

Voyage 3 Large

63477ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Voyage 3 LargeDescription
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1501
1528
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
42.9%
52.6%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.100
$0.180
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2024-02-07
2025-01-07
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.781
0.837
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
24024ms
63477ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

PG

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Voyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
37785ms
93447ms
Average response time
P50
37029ms
91578ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
43453ms
107464ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Voyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
5204ms
21279ms
Average response time
P50
5100ms
20853ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
5985ms
24471ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Voyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.619
0.675
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.591
0.638
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.222
0.255
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.329
0.362
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
33570ms
97066ms
Average response time
P50
32899ms
95125ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
38606ms
111626ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Voyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.637
0.753
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.654
0.780
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.621
0.742
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.692
0.837
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
37581ms
80239ms
Average response time
P50
36829ms
78634ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
43218ms
92275ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Voyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.723
0.796
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.732
0.809
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.808
0.840
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.833
0.880
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
39542ms
92317ms
Average response time
P50
38751ms
90471ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
45473ms
106165ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Voyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.996
0.997
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.994
0.998
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.122
0.122
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.218
0.222
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
32380ms
75502ms
Average response time
P50
31732ms
73992ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
37237ms
86827ms
90th percentile

NorQuAD

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Voyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
3824ms
11003ms
Average response time
P50
3748ms
10783ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
4398ms
12653ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3Voyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.925
0.953
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.933
0.960
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.940
0.960
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.960
0.980
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
2305ms
36963ms
Average response time
P50
2259ms
36224ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
2651ms
42507ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.