Cohere Embed v3 vs Gemini text-embedding-004

Detailed comparison between Cohere Embed v3 and Gemini text-embedding-004. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Cohere Embed v3 takes the lead.

Both Cohere Embed v3 and Gemini text-embedding-004 are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Cohere Embed v3:

  • Cohere Embed v3 has 41 higher ELO rating
  • Cohere Embed v3 delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.686 vs 0.585)
  • Cohere Embed v3 is 20251ms faster on average
  • Cohere Embed v3 has a 13.0% higher win rate

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Cohere Embed v3

1488

Gemini text-embedding-004

1447

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Cohere Embed v3

41.0%

Gemini text-embedding-004

28.0%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Cohere Embed v3

0.686

Gemini text-embedding-004

0.585

Average Latency

Response time

Cohere Embed v3

22849ms

Gemini text-embedding-004

43100ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricCohere Embed v3Gemini text-embedding-004Description
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1488
1447
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
41.0%
28.0%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.100
$0.020
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2024-02-07
2024-05-14
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.686
0.585
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
22849ms
43100ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

PG

MetricCohere Embed v3Gemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
35998ms
76115ms
Average response time
P50
35278ms
74593ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
41398ms
87532ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricCohere Embed v3Gemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
4704ms
9184ms
Average response time
P50
4610ms
9000ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
5410ms
10562ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricCohere Embed v3Gemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.634
0.536
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.619
0.517
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.219
0.200
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.353
0.304
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
30356ms
59127ms
Average response time
P50
29749ms
57944ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
34909ms
67996ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricCohere Embed v3Gemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.641
0.613
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.650
0.649
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.639
0.645
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.678
0.748
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
33241ms
62373ms
Average response time
P50
32576ms
61126ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
38227ms
71729ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricCohere Embed v3Gemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.729
0.722
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.769
0.745
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.788
0.797
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.900
0.860
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
41205ms
65774ms
Average response time
P50
40381ms
64459ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
47386ms
75640ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricCohere Embed v3Gemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
1.000
0.979
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.996
0.977
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.123
0.118
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.218
0.209
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
30494ms
62416ms
Average response time
P50
29884ms
61168ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
35068ms
71778ms
90th percentile

NorQuAD

MetricCohere Embed v3Gemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
3703ms
5693ms
Average response time
P50
3629ms
5579ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
4258ms
6547ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricCohere Embed v3Gemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.349
0.030
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.398
0.036
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.380
0.040
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.520
0.060
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
3093ms
4118ms
Average response time
P50
3031ms
4036ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
3557ms
4736ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.