OpenAI text-embedding-3-large vs Qwen3 Embedding 8B

Detailed comparison between OpenAI text-embedding-3-large and Qwen3 Embedding 8B. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large takes the lead.

Both OpenAI text-embedding-3-large and Qwen3 Embedding 8B are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why OpenAI text-embedding-3-large:

  • OpenAI text-embedding-3-large has 23 higher ELO rating
  • OpenAI text-embedding-3-large is 97836ms faster on average
  • OpenAI text-embedding-3-large has a 7.8% higher win rate

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large

1539

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

1516

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large

55.7%

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

47.9%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large

0.811

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

0.818

Average Latency

Response time

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large

32922ms

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

130758ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1539
1516
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
55.7%
47.9%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.130
$0.050
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2024-01-25
2025-06-06
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.811
0.818
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
32922ms
130758ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

PG

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
57366ms
151470ms
Average response time
P50
56219ms
148441ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
65971ms
174191ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
8013ms
93874ms
Average response time
P50
7853ms
91997ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
9215ms
107955ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.648
0.633
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.641
0.625
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.255
0.235
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.377
0.381
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
42058ms
200373ms
Average response time
P50
41217ms
196366ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
48367ms
230429ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.730
0.760
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.752
0.781
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.700
0.732
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.781
0.814
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
48635ms
189471ms
Average response time
P50
47662ms
185682ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
55930ms
217892ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.726
0.750
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.761
0.765
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.768
0.843
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.863
0.883
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
55796ms
200031ms
Average response time
P50
54680ms
196030ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
64165ms
230036ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
1.000
1.000
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
1.000
1.000
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.123
0.123
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.224
0.224
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
41860ms
180144ms
Average response time
P50
41023ms
176541ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
48139ms
207166ms
90th percentile

NorQuAD

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
5613ms
18544ms
Average response time
P50
5501ms
18173ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
6455ms
21326ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.899
0.913
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.899
0.919
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.940
0.920
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.940
0.940
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
4036ms
12156ms
Average response time
P50
3955ms
11913ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
4641ms
13979ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.