OpenAI text-embedding-3-large vs Voyage 3 Large

Detailed comparison between OpenAI text-embedding-3-large and Voyage 3 Large. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large takes the lead.

Both OpenAI text-embedding-3-large and Voyage 3 Large are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why OpenAI text-embedding-3-large:

  • OpenAI text-embedding-3-large has 11 higher ELO rating
  • Voyage 3 Large delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.837 vs 0.811)
  • OpenAI text-embedding-3-large is 30555ms faster on average

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large

1539

Voyage 3 Large

1528

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large

55.7%

Voyage 3 Large

52.6%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large

0.811

Voyage 3 Large

0.837

Average Latency

Response time

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large

32922ms

Voyage 3 Large

63477ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeVoyage 3 LargeDescription
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1539
1528
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
55.7%
52.6%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.130
$0.180
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2024-01-25
2025-01-07
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.811
0.837
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
32922ms
63477ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

PG

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeVoyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
57366ms
93447ms
Average response time
P50
56219ms
91578ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
65971ms
107464ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeVoyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
8013ms
21279ms
Average response time
P50
7853ms
20853ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
9215ms
24471ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeVoyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.648
0.675
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.641
0.638
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.255
0.255
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.377
0.362
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
42058ms
97066ms
Average response time
P50
41217ms
95125ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
48367ms
111626ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeVoyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.730
0.753
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.752
0.780
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.700
0.742
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.781
0.837
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
48635ms
80239ms
Average response time
P50
47662ms
78634ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
55930ms
92275ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeVoyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.726
0.796
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.761
0.809
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.768
0.840
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.863
0.880
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
55796ms
92317ms
Average response time
P50
54680ms
90471ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
64165ms
106165ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeVoyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
1.000
0.997
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
1.000
0.998
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.123
0.122
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.224
0.222
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
41860ms
75502ms
Average response time
P50
41023ms
73992ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
48139ms
86827ms
90th percentile

NorQuAD

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeVoyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
5613ms
11003ms
Average response time
P50
5501ms
10783ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
6455ms
12653ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeVoyage 3 LargeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.899
0.953
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.899
0.960
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.940
0.960
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.940
0.980
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
4036ms
36963ms
Average response time
P50
3955ms
36224ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
4641ms
42507ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.