OpenAI text-embedding-3-small vs Qwen3 Embedding 8B

Detailed comparison between OpenAI text-embedding-3-small and Qwen3 Embedding 8B. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Qwen3 Embedding 8B takes the lead.

Both OpenAI text-embedding-3-small and Qwen3 Embedding 8B are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Qwen3 Embedding 8B:

  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B has 12 higher ELO rating
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.818 vs 0.762)
  • OpenAI text-embedding-3-small is 100800ms faster on average

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

OpenAI text-embedding-3-small

1503

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

1516

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

OpenAI text-embedding-3-small

44.6%

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

47.9%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

OpenAI text-embedding-3-small

0.762

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

0.818

Average Latency

Response time

OpenAI text-embedding-3-small

29958ms

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

130758ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1503
1516
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
44.6%
47.9%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.020
$0.050
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2024-01-25
2025-06-06
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.762
0.818
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
29958ms
130758ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

PG

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
55877ms
151470ms
Average response time
P50
54759ms
148441ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
64259ms
174191ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
5645ms
93874ms
Average response time
P50
5532ms
91997ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
6492ms
107955ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.605
0.633
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.604
0.625
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.230
0.235
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.365
0.381
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
35365ms
200373ms
Average response time
P50
34658ms
196366ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
40670ms
230429ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.635
0.760
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.647
0.781
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.623
0.732
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.681
0.814
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
41338ms
189471ms
Average response time
P50
40511ms
185682ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
47539ms
217892ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.682
0.750
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.707
0.765
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.778
0.843
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.843
0.883
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
55544ms
200031ms
Average response time
P50
54433ms
196030ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
63876ms
230036ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.997
1.000
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.990
1.000
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.122
0.123
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.213
0.224
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
35961ms
180144ms
Average response time
P50
35242ms
176541ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
41355ms
207166ms
90th percentile

NorQuAD

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
6467ms
18544ms
Average response time
P50
6338ms
18173ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
7437ms
21326ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallQwen3 Embedding 8BDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.855
0.913
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.862
0.919
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.900
0.920
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.920
0.940
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
3464ms
12156ms
Average response time
P50
3395ms
11913ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
3984ms
13979ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.