Qwen3 Embedding 8B vs Gemini text-embedding-004

Detailed comparison between Qwen3 Embedding 8B and Gemini text-embedding-004. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Qwen3 Embedding 8B takes the lead.

Both Qwen3 Embedding 8B and Gemini text-embedding-004 are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Qwen3 Embedding 8B:

  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B has 69 higher ELO rating
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.818 vs 0.585)
  • Gemini text-embedding-004 is 87658ms faster on average
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B has a 20.0% higher win rate

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

1516

Gemini text-embedding-004

1447

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

47.9%

Gemini text-embedding-004

28.0%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

0.818

Gemini text-embedding-004

0.585

Average Latency

Response time

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

130758ms

Gemini text-embedding-004

43100ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BGemini text-embedding-004Description
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1516
1447
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
47.9%
28.0%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.050
$0.020
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2025-06-06
2024-05-14
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.818
0.585
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
130758ms
43100ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

PG

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
151470ms
76115ms
Average response time
P50
148441ms
74593ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
174191ms
87532ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
93874ms
9184ms
Average response time
P50
91997ms
9000ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
107955ms
10562ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.633
0.536
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.625
0.517
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.235
0.200
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.381
0.304
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
200373ms
59127ms
Average response time
P50
196366ms
57944ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
230429ms
67996ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.760
0.613
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.781
0.649
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.732
0.645
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.814
0.748
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
189471ms
62373ms
Average response time
P50
185682ms
61126ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
217892ms
71729ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.750
0.722
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.765
0.745
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.843
0.797
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.883
0.860
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
200031ms
65774ms
Average response time
P50
196030ms
64459ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
230036ms
75640ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
1.000
0.979
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
1.000
0.977
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.123
0.118
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.224
0.209
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
180144ms
62416ms
Average response time
P50
176541ms
61168ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
207166ms
71778ms
90th percentile

NorQuAD

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
18544ms
5693ms
Average response time
P50
18173ms
5579ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
21326ms
6547ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.913
0.030
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.919
0.036
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.920
0.040
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.940
0.060
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
12156ms
4118ms
Average response time
P50
11913ms
4036ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
13979ms
4736ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.