Qwen3 Embedding 8B vs Jina Embeddings v3

Detailed comparison between Qwen3 Embedding 8B and Jina Embeddings v3. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Qwen3 Embedding 8B takes the lead.

Both Qwen3 Embedding 8B and Jina Embeddings v3 are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Qwen3 Embedding 8B:

  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B has 25 higher ELO rating
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.818 vs 0.766)
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B is 83005ms faster on average
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B has a 7.7% higher win rate

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

1516

Jina Embeddings v3

1491

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

47.9%

Jina Embeddings v3

40.3%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

0.818

Jina Embeddings v3

0.766

Average Latency

Response time

Qwen3 Embedding 8B

130758ms

Jina Embeddings v3

213763ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BJina Embeddings v3Description
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1516
1491
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
47.9%
40.3%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.050
$0.045
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2025-06-06
2024-09-18
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.818
0.766
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
130758ms
213763ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

PG

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BJina Embeddings v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
151470ms
155423ms
Average response time
P50
148441ms
152315ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
174191ms
178736ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BJina Embeddings v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
93874ms
18149ms
Average response time
P50
91997ms
17786ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
107955ms
20871ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BJina Embeddings v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.633
0.616
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.625
0.591
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.235
0.225
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.381
0.340
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
200373ms
199515ms
Average response time
P50
196366ms
195525ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
230429ms
229442ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BJina Embeddings v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.760
0.645
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.781
0.679
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.732
0.633
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.814
0.741
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
189471ms
458812ms
Average response time
P50
185682ms
449636ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
217892ms
527634ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BJina Embeddings v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.750
0.622
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.765
0.661
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.843
0.695
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.883
0.800
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
200031ms
270629ms
Average response time
P50
196030ms
265216ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
230036ms
311223ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BJina Embeddings v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
1.000
1.000
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
1.000
0.997
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.123
0.123
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.224
0.220
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
180144ms
476020ms
Average response time
P50
176541ms
466500ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
207166ms
547423ms
90th percentile

NorQuAD

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BJina Embeddings v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
18544ms
45614ms
Average response time
P50
18173ms
44702ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
21326ms
52456ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricQwen3 Embedding 8BJina Embeddings v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.913
0.888
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.919
0.900
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.920
0.920
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.940
0.960
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
12156ms
85941ms
Average response time
P50
11913ms
84222ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
13979ms
98832ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.