Voyage 3 Large vs Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

Detailed comparison between Voyage 3 Large and Cohere Embed Multilingual v3. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Voyage 3 Large takes the lead.

Both Voyage 3 Large and Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Voyage 3 Large:

  • Voyage 3 Large has 28 higher ELO rating
  • Voyage 3 Large delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.837 vs 0.781)
  • Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 is 39453ms faster on average
  • Voyage 3 Large has a 9.7% higher win rate

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Voyage 3 Large

1528

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

1501

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Voyage 3 Large

52.6%

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

42.9%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Voyage 3 Large

0.837

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

0.781

Average Latency

Response time

Voyage 3 Large

63477ms

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

24024ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricVoyage 3 LargeCohere Embed Multilingual v3Description
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1528
1501
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
52.6%
42.9%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.180
$0.100
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2025-01-07
2024-02-07
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.837
0.781
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
63477ms
24024ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

PG

MetricVoyage 3 LargeCohere Embed Multilingual v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
93447ms
37785ms
Average response time
P50
91578ms
37029ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
107464ms
43453ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricVoyage 3 LargeCohere Embed Multilingual v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
21279ms
5204ms
Average response time
P50
20853ms
5100ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
24471ms
5985ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricVoyage 3 LargeCohere Embed Multilingual v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.675
0.619
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.638
0.591
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.255
0.222
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.362
0.329
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
97066ms
33570ms
Average response time
P50
95125ms
32899ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
111626ms
38606ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricVoyage 3 LargeCohere Embed Multilingual v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.753
0.637
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.780
0.654
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.742
0.621
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.837
0.692
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
80239ms
37581ms
Average response time
P50
78634ms
36829ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
92275ms
43218ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricVoyage 3 LargeCohere Embed Multilingual v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.796
0.723
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.809
0.732
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.840
0.808
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.880
0.833
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
92317ms
39542ms
Average response time
P50
90471ms
38751ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
106165ms
45473ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricVoyage 3 LargeCohere Embed Multilingual v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.997
0.996
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.998
0.994
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.122
0.122
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.222
0.218
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
75502ms
32380ms
Average response time
P50
73992ms
31732ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
86827ms
37237ms
90th percentile

NorQuAD

MetricVoyage 3 LargeCohere Embed Multilingual v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
11003ms
3824ms
Average response time
P50
10783ms
3748ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
12653ms
4398ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricVoyage 3 LargeCohere Embed Multilingual v3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.953
0.925
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.960
0.933
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.960
0.940
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.980
0.960
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
36963ms
2305ms
Average response time
P50
36224ms
2259ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
42507ms
2651ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.