Voyage 3 Large vs Gemini text-embedding-004

Detailed comparison between Voyage 3 Large and Gemini text-embedding-004. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Voyage 3 Large takes the lead.

Both Voyage 3 Large and Gemini text-embedding-004 are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Voyage 3 Large:

  • Voyage 3 Large has 81 higher ELO rating
  • Voyage 3 Large delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.837 vs 0.585)
  • Voyage 3 Large has a 24.6% higher win rate

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Voyage 3 Large

1528

Gemini text-embedding-004

1447

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Voyage 3 Large

52.6%

Gemini text-embedding-004

28.0%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Voyage 3 Large

0.837

Gemini text-embedding-004

0.585

Average Latency

Response time

Voyage 3 Large

29ms

Gemini text-embedding-004

13ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricVoyage 3 LargeGemini text-embedding-004Description
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1528
1447
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
52.6%
28.0%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.180
$0.020
Cost per million tokens processed
Dimensions
1024
768
Vector embedding dimensions (lower is more efficient)
Release Date
2025-01-07
2024-05-14
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.837
0.585
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
29ms
13ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

PG

MetricVoyage 3 LargeGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
16ms
13ms
Average response time
P50
16ms
13ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
18ms
15ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricVoyage 3 LargeGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
30ms
13ms
Average response time
P50
30ms
12ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
35ms
14ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricVoyage 3 LargeGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.675
0.536
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.638
0.517
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.255
0.200
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.362
0.304
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
19ms
12ms
Average response time
P50
19ms
11ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
22ms
13ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricVoyage 3 LargeGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.753
0.613
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.780
0.649
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.742
0.645
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.837
0.748
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
16ms
12ms
Average response time
P50
16ms
12ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
18ms
14ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricVoyage 3 LargeGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.796
0.722
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.809
0.745
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.840
0.797
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.880
0.860
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
18ms
13ms
Average response time
P50
18ms
13ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
21ms
15ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricVoyage 3 LargeGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.997
0.979
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.998
0.977
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.122
0.118
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.222
0.209
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
15ms
12ms
Average response time
P50
15ms
12ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
17ms
14ms
90th percentile

NorQuAD

MetricVoyage 3 LargeGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
24ms
13ms
Average response time
P50
23ms
13ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
28ms
15ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricVoyage 3 LargeGemini text-embedding-004Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.953
0.030
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.960
0.036
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.960
0.040
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.980
0.060
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
97ms
13ms
Average response time
P50
95ms
13ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
112ms
15ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.