Voyage 3 Large vs OpenAI text-embedding-3-large

Detailed comparison between Voyage 3 Large and OpenAI text-embedding-3-large. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large takes the lead.

Both Voyage 3 Large and OpenAI text-embedding-3-large are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why OpenAI text-embedding-3-large:

  • OpenAI text-embedding-3-large has 11 higher ELO rating
  • Voyage 3 Large delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.837 vs 0.811)
  • OpenAI text-embedding-3-large is 30555ms faster on average

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Voyage 3 Large

1528

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large

1539

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Voyage 3 Large

52.6%

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large

55.7%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Voyage 3 Large

0.837

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large

0.811

Average Latency

Response time

Voyage 3 Large

63477ms

OpenAI text-embedding-3-large

32922ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeDescription
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1528
1539
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
52.6%
55.7%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.180
$0.130
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2025-01-07
2024-01-25
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.837
0.811
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
63477ms
32922ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

PG

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
93447ms
57366ms
Average response time
P50
91578ms
56219ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
107464ms
65971ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
21279ms
8013ms
Average response time
P50
20853ms
7853ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
24471ms
9215ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.675
0.648
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.638
0.641
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.255
0.255
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.362
0.377
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
97066ms
42058ms
Average response time
P50
95125ms
41217ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
111626ms
48367ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.753
0.730
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.780
0.752
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.742
0.700
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.837
0.781
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
80239ms
48635ms
Average response time
P50
78634ms
47662ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
92275ms
55930ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.796
0.726
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.809
0.761
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.840
0.768
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.880
0.863
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
92317ms
55796ms
Average response time
P50
90471ms
54680ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
106165ms
64165ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.997
1.000
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.998
1.000
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.122
0.123
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.222
0.224
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
75502ms
41860ms
Average response time
P50
73992ms
41023ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
86827ms
48139ms
90th percentile

NorQuAD

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
11003ms
5613ms
Average response time
P50
10783ms
5501ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
12653ms
6455ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-largeDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.953
0.899
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.960
0.899
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.960
0.940
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.980
0.940
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
36963ms
4036ms
Average response time
P50
36224ms
3955ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
42507ms
4641ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.