Voyage 3 Large vs OpenAI text-embedding-3-small

Detailed comparison between Voyage 3 Large and OpenAI text-embedding-3-small. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Voyage 3 Large takes the lead.

Both Voyage 3 Large and OpenAI text-embedding-3-small are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Voyage 3 Large:

  • Voyage 3 Large has 25 higher ELO rating
  • Voyage 3 Large delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.837 vs 0.762)
  • OpenAI text-embedding-3-small is 33519ms faster on average
  • Voyage 3 Large has a 8.0% higher win rate

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Voyage 3 Large

1528

OpenAI text-embedding-3-small

1503

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Voyage 3 Large

52.6%

OpenAI text-embedding-3-small

44.6%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Voyage 3 Large

0.837

OpenAI text-embedding-3-small

0.762

Average Latency

Response time

Voyage 3 Large

63477ms

OpenAI text-embedding-3-small

29958ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallDescription
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1528
1503
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
52.6%
44.6%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.180
$0.020
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2025-01-07
2024-01-25
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.837
0.762
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
63477ms
29958ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

PG

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
93447ms
55877ms
Average response time
P50
91578ms
54759ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
107464ms
64259ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
21279ms
5645ms
Average response time
P50
20853ms
5532ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
24471ms
6492ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.675
0.605
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.638
0.604
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.255
0.230
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.362
0.365
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
97066ms
35365ms
Average response time
P50
95125ms
34658ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
111626ms
40670ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.753
0.635
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.780
0.647
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.742
0.623
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.837
0.681
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
80239ms
41338ms
Average response time
P50
78634ms
40511ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
92275ms
47539ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.796
0.682
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.809
0.707
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.840
0.778
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.880
0.843
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
92317ms
55544ms
Average response time
P50
90471ms
54433ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
106165ms
63876ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.997
0.997
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.998
0.990
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.122
0.122
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.222
0.213
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
75502ms
35961ms
Average response time
P50
73992ms
35242ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
86827ms
41355ms
90th percentile

NorQuAD

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallDescription
Accuracy Metrics
Latency Metrics
Mean
11003ms
6467ms
Average response time
P50
10783ms
6338ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
12653ms
7437ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricVoyage 3 LargeOpenAI text-embedding-3-smallDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.953
0.855
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.960
0.862
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.960
0.900
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.980
0.920
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
36963ms
3464ms
Average response time
P50
36224ms
3395ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
42507ms
3984ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.