LanceDB vs Elasticsearch
Compare deployment options, cost efficiency, and features to choose the right vector database for your application.
Database Comparison
LanceDB takes the lead.
Both LanceDB and Elasticsearch are powerful vector databases designed for efficient similarity search and storage. However, their deployment options and features differ in important ways.
Why LanceDB:
- LanceDB ranks higher overall
- LanceDB is more cost-effective
- LanceDB has more permissive licensing
- LanceDB has 1 more strengths
LanceDB
LanceDB is an open-source, AI-native multimodal lakehouse designed for billion-scale vector search. Built on the Lance columnar format, it combines embedded simplicity with cloud-scale performance. LanceDB's disk-based architecture with compute-storage separation enables up to 100x cost savings compared to memory-based solutions while supporting multimodal data (text, images, video, audio).
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch is one of Europe's most widely deployed open-source search engines that includes native vector database capabilities. It combines dense vector search with traditional full-text BM25 keyword search for powerful hybrid retrieval, making it ideal for RAG applications that need both semantic and lexical search capabilities.
Feature Comparison
Infrastructure & Technical Details
| Feature | LanceDB | Elasticsearch |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Embedded/Local, Self-Hosted, Managed Cloud (LanceDB Cloud) | Self-Hosted, Managed Cloud, Serverless |
| Cost | OSS: Free; Cloud: usage-based with $100 free credits; Enterprise: custom pricing | Serverless: usage-based (ECU); Hosted: starts ~$95/month; Self-hosted: free (infra cost only) |
| License | Apache 2.0 | AGPL v3 / SSPL / Elastic License 2.0 |
| Index Types | IVF-PQ, IVF-HNSW-PQ, BTree | HNSW, int8_hnsw, int4_hnsw, bbq_hnsw, Flat |
| Cloud Providers | AWS, Azure, GCP, Any (self-hosted) | AWS, Azure, GCP, Alibaba Cloud |
| Regional Flexibility | high | high |
| Strengths | 13 | 12 |
| Weaknesses | 9 | 8 |