Turbopuffer vs Elasticsearch
Compare deployment options, cost efficiency, and features to choose the right vector database for your application. If you want to compare these models on your data, try Agentset.
Database Comparison
Turbopuffer takes the lead.
Both Turbopuffer and Elasticsearch are powerful vector databases designed for efficient similarity search and storage. However, their deployment options and features differ in important ways.
Why Turbopuffer:
- Turbopuffer ranks higher overall
- Elasticsearch offers more deployment options
- Turbopuffer is more cost-effective
- Elasticsearch has more permissive licensing
- Elasticsearch has 5 more strengths
Vector Databases Are Just One Piece of RAG
Agentset gives you a managed RAG pipeline with the top-ranked models and best practices baked in. No infrastructure to maintain, no vector database to operate.
Trusted by teams building production RAG applications
Turbopuffer
⭐Turbopuffer is a fully managed cloud vector database built around a centroid-optimized SPFresh index. It is designed for extremely low-cost, large-scale storage, leveraging object storage engines like S3, GCS, or Azure Blob.
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch is one of Europe's most widely deployed open-source search engines that includes native vector database capabilities. It combines dense vector search with traditional full-text BM25 keyword search for powerful hybrid retrieval, making it ideal for RAG applications that need both semantic and lexical search capabilities.
Build RAG in Minutes, Not Months
Agentset gives you a complete RAG API with fully managed vector storage and retrieval. Upload your data, call the API, and get accurate results from day one.
import { Agentset } from "agentset";
const agentset = new Agentset();
const ns = agentset.namespace("ns_1234");
const results = await ns.search(
"What is multi-head attention?"
);
for (const result of results) {
console.log(result.text);
}Feature Comparison
Infrastructure & Technical Details
| Feature | Turbopuffer | Elasticsearch |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | BYOC, Managed Cloud | Self-Hosted, Managed Cloud, Serverless |
| Cost | Minimum commitment $64/month | Serverless: usage-based (ECU); Hosted: starts ~$95/month; Self-hosted: free (infra cost only) |
| License | Proprietary | AGPL v3 / SSPL / Elastic License 2.0 |
| Index Types | SPFresh | HNSW, int8_hnsw, int4_hnsw, bbq_hnsw, Flat |
| Cloud Providers | AWS, GCP, Azure | AWS, Azure, GCP, Alibaba Cloud |
| Regional Flexibility | high | high |
| Strengths | 7 | 12 |
| Weaknesses | 7 | 8 |