Weaviate vs Pinecone
Compare deployment options, cost efficiency, and features to choose the right vector database for your application. If you want to compare these models on your data, try Agentset.
Database Comparison
Weaviate takes the lead.
Both Weaviate and Pinecone are powerful vector databases designed for efficient similarity search and storage. However, their deployment options and features differ in important ways.
Why Weaviate:
- Weaviate ranks higher overall
- Weaviate offers more deployment options
- Weaviate is more cost-effective
- Weaviate has more permissive licensing
- Weaviate has 1 more strengths
Vector Databases Are Just One Piece of RAG
Agentset gives you a managed RAG pipeline with the top-ranked models and best practices baked in. No infrastructure to maintain, no vector database to operate.
Trusted by teams building production RAG applications
Weaviate
Weaviate is a cloud and self-hosted vector database offering hybrid dense+sparse search, strong metadata filtering, and a modular storage layer. It is designed for enterprise and production RAG workloads that require flexibility and scalable cloud hosting.
Pinecone
Pinecone is a fully managed, proprietary cloud vector database designed for high-performance RAG pipelines. It abstracts away infrastructure, scaling, replication, and index management. Pinecone is popular among companies building production RAG systems that need predictable latency and fully hosted operations.
Build RAG in Minutes, Not Months
Agentset gives you a complete RAG API with fully managed vector storage and retrieval. Upload your data, call the API, and get accurate results from day one.
import { Agentset } from "agentset";
const agentset = new Agentset();
const ns = agentset.namespace("ns_1234");
const results = await ns.search(
"What is multi-head attention?"
);
for (const result of results) {
console.log(result.text);
}Feature Comparison
Infrastructure & Technical Details
| Feature | Weaviate | Pinecone |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Self-Hosted, Managed Cloud | Managed Cloud |
| Cost | Free (self-host), cloud starts ~$25/mo | Storage: $0.33/GB/mo; Write Units: $4/million; Read Units: $16/million; Minimum $50/mo |
| License | BSD | Proprietary |
| Index Types | HNSW, Hybrid dense+sparse | Dense (HNSW-like), Sparse |
| Cloud Providers | AWS, GCP | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| Regional Flexibility | low | low |
| Strengths | 8 | 7 |
| Weaknesses | 6 | 7 |