Redis Vector Search
Redis provides vector similarity search through Redis Stack (RediSearch module), enabling low-latency semantic search and RAG applications. As an in-memory database, Redis excels at small-to-medium scale vector workloads requiring ultra-low latency. It integrates vector search with Redis's core data structures, making it ideal for real-time AI applications, semantic caching, and RAG systems. If you want to compare the best vector databases for your data, try Agentset.
Vector Databases Are Just One Piece of RAG
Agentset gives you a managed RAG pipeline with the top-ranked models and best practices baked in. No infrastructure to maintain, no vector database to operate.
Trusted by teams building production RAG applications
Deployment
Self-Hosted (Redis Stack), Redis Enterprise, Redis Cloud
Cost
Redis Stack: Free (self-host); Cloud: starts $5/mo; Enterprise: shard-based pricing; Redis Flex: hybrid RAM+SSD
Index Types
FLAT, HNSW
Deployment
Infrastructure Options
Deployment Types
- Self-Hosted (Redis Stack)
- Redis Enterprise
- Redis Cloud
Cloud Providers
- AWS
- Azure
- GCP
Strengths
What Redis Vector Search Does Well
- Ultra-low latency for small-to-medium datasets (sub-5ms)
- Excellent for semantic caching and real-time AI agents
- Integrated with Redis core features (pub/sub, streams, JSON)
- Simple setup for teams already using Redis
- Hybrid search combining vectors with full-text (RediSearch)
- Both FLAT (exact) and HNSW (approximate) indexing
- Multiple distance metrics (Euclidean, Cosine, Inner Product)
- Redis Flex option for cost savings (RAM + SSD hybrid)
- Strong ecosystem and community
- Available across all major cloud providers
- Great for recommendation systems and similarity matching
Weaknesses
Potential Drawbacks
- Memory constraints: entire dataset must fit in RAM (expensive)
- Storing 10M vectors (1536d) requires ~60GB RAM (~$300+/month)
- RAM costs 10-30x more than disk storage at scale
- Performance degrades sharply when data exceeds RAM
- Not cost-effective beyond 10M vectors
- HNSW graph structure consumes more memory than vectors themselves
- Limited to 32,768 dimensions per vector
- Maximum 10 attributes per index
- No automatic memory management (manual eviction policies)
- Only HNSW indexing (vs Milvus with IVF, DiskANN options)
- Horizontal scaling requires manual sharding
- Not suitable for billion-scale vector datasets
Use Cases
When to Choose Redis Vector Search
Ideal For
- Real-time AI applications requiring sub-5ms latency
- Semantic caching for LLM responses
- Small-to-medium vector datasets (under 10M vectors)
- Applications already using Redis infrastructure
- Recommendation engines with fast response needs
- RAG systems with modest document volumes
- Chatbots needing ultra-fast context retrieval
- Session-based personalization with vectors
- Multi-modal search combining Redis data types
Not Ideal For
- Large-scale datasets (100M+ vectors) due to RAM costs
- Cost-sensitive projects at scale
- Applications where latency >50ms is acceptable (use disk-based DBs)
- Billion-vector workloads
- Teams without Redis operational expertise
- Use cases where vectors exceed 32K dimensions
- Applications needing advanced indexing options (IVF, DiskANN)
Build RAG in Minutes, Not Months
Agentset gives you a complete RAG API with fully managed vector storage and retrieval. Upload your data, call the API, and get accurate results from day one.
import { Agentset } from "agentset";
const agentset = new Agentset();
const ns = agentset.namespace("ns_1234");
const results = await ns.search(
"What is multi-head attention?"
);
for (const result of results) {
console.log(result.text);
}Compare Databases
See how it stacks up
Compare Redis Vector Search with other vector databases to understand the differences in deployment options, cost, and features.
vs Qdrant
Qdrant
vs Chroma
Chroma
vs Milvus
Zilliz / LFAI & Data Foundation