Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 vs BAAI/bge-m3

Detailed comparison between Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 and BAAI/bge-m3. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs. If you want to compare these models on your data, try Agentset.

Model Comparison

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 takes the lead.

Both Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 and BAAI/bge-m3 are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Cohere Embed Multilingual v3:

  • Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 has 32 higher ELO rating
  • Cohere Embed Multilingual v3 delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.701 vs 0.674)

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

1512

BAAI/bge-m3

1480

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

48.4%

BAAI/bge-m3

44.3%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

0.701

BAAI/bge-m3

0.674

Average Latency

Response time

Cohere Embed Multilingual v3

7ms

BAAI/bge-m3

34ms

Embedding Models Are Just One Piece of RAG

Agentset gives you a managed RAG pipeline with the top-ranked models and best practices baked in. No infrastructure to maintain, no embeddings to manage.

Trusted by teams building production RAG applications

5M+
Documents
1,500+
Teams
99.9%
Uptime

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3BAAI/bge-m3Description
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1512
1480
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
48.4%
44.3%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.100
$0.010
Cost per million tokens processed
Dimensions
512
1024
Vector embedding dimensions (lower is more efficient)
Release Date
2024-02-07
2024-01-27
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.701
0.674
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
7ms
34ms
Average response time across all datasets

Build RAG in Minutes, Not Months

Agentset gives you a complete RAG API with top-ranked embedding models and smart retrieval built in. Upload your data, call the API, and get accurate results from day one.

import { Agentset } from "agentset";

const agentset = new Agentset();
const ns = agentset.namespace("ns_1234");

const results = await ns.search(
  "What is multi-head attention?"
);

for (const result of results) {
  console.log(result.text);
}

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

business reports

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3BAAI/bge-m3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.000
0.000
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.000
0.000
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.000
0.000
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.000
0.000
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
8ms
27ms
Average response time
P50
8ms
27ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
8ms
27ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3BAAI/bge-m3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.786
0.801
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.783
0.785
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.061
0.061
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.122
0.122
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
7ms
21ms
Average response time
P50
7ms
21ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
7ms
21ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3BAAI/bge-m3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.804
0.743
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.812
0.755
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.624
0.608
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.696
0.667
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
7ms
22ms
Average response time
P50
7ms
22ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
7ms
22ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3BAAI/bge-m3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.696
0.571
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.702
0.599
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.804
0.645
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.830
0.759
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
7ms
37ms
Average response time
P50
7ms
37ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
7ms
37ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3BAAI/bge-m3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.952
0.956
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.941
0.941
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.121
0.121
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.218
0.219
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
8ms
51ms
Average response time
P50
8ms
51ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
8ms
51ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricCohere Embed Multilingual v3BAAI/bge-m3Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.868
0.879
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.875
0.879
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.940
0.960
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.960
0.960
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
7ms
48ms
Average response time
P50
7ms
48ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
7ms
48ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.