Jina Embeddings v5 Text Small vs zembed-1

Detailed comparison between Jina Embeddings v5 Text Small and zembed-1. See which embedding best meets your accuracy and performance needs. If you want to compare these models on your data, try Agentset.

Model Comparison

zembed-1 takes the lead.

Both Jina Embeddings v5 Text Small and zembed-1 are powerful embedding models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why zembed-1:

  • zembed-1 has 24 higher ELO rating
  • zembed-1 delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.619 vs 0.608)

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Jina Embeddings v5 Text Small

1566

zembed-1

1590

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Jina Embeddings v5 Text Small

54.7%

zembed-1

59.2%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Jina Embeddings v5 Text Small

0.608

zembed-1

0.619

Average Latency

Response time

Jina Embeddings v5 Text Small

289ms

zembed-1

250ms

Embedding Models Are Just One Piece of RAG

Agentset gives you a managed RAG pipeline with the top-ranked models and best practices baked in. No infrastructure to maintain, no embeddings to manage.

Trusted by teams building production RAG applications

5M+
Documents
1,500+
Teams
99.9%
Uptime

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricJina Embeddings v5 Text Smallzembed-1Description
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1566
1590
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
54.7%
59.2%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.050
$0.050
Cost per million tokens processed
Dimensions
1024
2048
Vector embedding dimensions (lower is more efficient)
Release Date
2026-02-18
2026-03-02
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.608
0.619
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
289ms
250ms
Average response time across all datasets

Build RAG in Minutes, Not Months

Agentset gives you a complete RAG API with top-ranked embedding models and smart retrieval built in. Upload your data, call the API, and get accurate results from day one.

import { Agentset } from "agentset";

const agentset = new Agentset();
const ns = agentset.namespace("ns_1234");

const results = await ns.search(
  "What is multi-head attention?"
);

for (const result of results) {
  console.log(result.text);
}

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

PG

MetricJina Embeddings v5 Text Smallzembed-1Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.000
0.000
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.000
0.000
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.000
0.000
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.000
0.000
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
291ms
250ms
Average response time
P50
241ms
250ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
290ms
250ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricJina Embeddings v5 Text Smallzembed-1Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.000
0.000
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.000
0.000
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.000
0.000
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.000
0.000
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
283ms
250ms
Average response time
P50
247ms
250ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
322ms
250ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricJina Embeddings v5 Text Smallzembed-1Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.823
0.832
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.805
0.811
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.062
0.062
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.123
0.121
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
270ms
250ms
Average response time
P50
239ms
250ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
264ms
250ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricJina Embeddings v5 Text Smallzembed-1Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.838
0.862
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.831
0.855
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.677
0.668
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.771
0.712
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
300ms
250ms
Average response time
P50
241ms
250ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
419ms
250ms
90th percentile

SciFact

MetricJina Embeddings v5 Text Smallzembed-1Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.703
0.767
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.734
0.777
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.789
0.888
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.898
0.929
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
267ms
250ms
Average response time
P50
240ms
250ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
265ms
250ms
90th percentile

MSMARCO

MetricJina Embeddings v5 Text Smallzembed-1Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.960
0.955
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.954
0.946
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.122
0.123
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.219
0.223
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
273ms
250ms
Average response time
P50
239ms
250ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
313ms
250ms
90th percentile

ARCD

MetricJina Embeddings v5 Text Smallzembed-1Description
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.842
0.851
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.842
0.858
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.940
0.920
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.940
0.940
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
336ms
250ms
Average response time
P50
248ms
250ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
305ms
250ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more embeddings

See how all embedding models stack up. Compare OpenAI, Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect embedding for your RAG application.