Cohere Rerank 3.5 vs Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

Detailed comparison between Cohere Rerank 3.5 and Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual. See which reranker best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Cohere Rerank 3.5 takes the lead.

Both Cohere Rerank 3.5 and Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual are powerful reranking models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Cohere Rerank 3.5:

  • Cohere Rerank 3.5 has 146 higher ELO rating
  • Cohere Rerank 3.5 is 355ms faster on average
  • Cohere Rerank 3.5 has a 12.5% higher win rate

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Cohere Rerank 3.5

1452

Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

1306

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Cohere Rerank 3.5

41.0%

Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

28.5%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Cohere Rerank 3.5

0.200

Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

0.193

Average Latency

Response time

Cohere Rerank 3.5

392ms

Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

746ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricCohere Rerank 3.5Jina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1452
1306
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
41.0%
28.5%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.050
$0.045
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2024-12-02
2024-06-25
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.200
0.193
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
392ms
746ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

MSMARCO

MetricCohere Rerank 3.5Jina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.522
0.499
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.553
0.539
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.700
0.680
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.800
0.800
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
339ms
694ms
Average response time
P50
285ms
616ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
304ms
911ms
90th percentile

arguana

MetricCohere Rerank 3.5Jina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.267
0.314
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.355
0.374
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.520
0.580
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.800
0.760
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
570ms
689ms
Average response time
P50
373ms
617ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
617ms
834ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricCohere Rerank 3.5Jina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.124
0.105
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.128
0.108
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.123
0.088
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.130
0.093
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
364ms
676ms
Average response time
P50
315ms
626ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
401ms
837ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricCohere Rerank 3.5Jina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Latency Metrics
Mean
334ms
690ms
Average response time
P50
293ms
620ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
503ms
824ms
90th percentile

PG

MetricCohere Rerank 3.5Jina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Latency Metrics
Mean
458ms
1059ms
Average response time
P50
360ms
823ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
615ms
1744ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricCohere Rerank 3.5Jina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.156
0.128
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.166
0.136
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.004
0.004
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.005
0.005
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
286ms
671ms
Average response time
P50
279ms
614ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
290ms
825ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more rerankers

See how all reranking models stack up. Compare Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, ZeRank, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect reranker for your RAG application.