Cohere Rerank 4 Fast vs Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

Detailed comparison between Cohere Rerank 4 Fast and Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual. See which reranker best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Cohere Rerank 4 Fast takes the lead.

Both Cohere Rerank 4 Fast and Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual are powerful reranking models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Cohere Rerank 4 Fast:

  • Cohere Rerank 4 Fast has 200 higher ELO rating
  • Cohere Rerank 4 Fast is 300ms faster on average
  • Cohere Rerank 4 Fast has a 20.8% higher win rate

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Cohere Rerank 4 Fast

1506

Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

1306

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Cohere Rerank 4 Fast

49.3%

Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

28.5%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Cohere Rerank 4 Fast

N/A

Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

0.080

Average Latency

Response time

Cohere Rerank 4 Fast

447ms

Jina Reranker v2 Base Multilingual

746ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricCohere Rerank 4 FastJina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1506
1306
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
49.3%
28.5%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.050
$0.045
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2025-12-11
2024-06-25
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
N/A
0.080
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
447ms
746ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

MSMARCO

MetricCohere Rerank 4 FastJina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Latency Metrics
Mean
403ms
694ms
Average response time
P50
382ms
616ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
486ms
911ms
90th percentile

arguana

MetricCohere Rerank 4 FastJina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Latency Metrics
Mean
574ms
689ms
Average response time
P50
562ms
617ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
728ms
834ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricCohere Rerank 4 FastJina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Latency Metrics
Mean
485ms
676ms
Average response time
P50
459ms
626ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
624ms
837ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricCohere Rerank 4 FastJina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Latency Metrics
Mean
428ms
690ms
Average response time
P50
408ms
620ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
550ms
824ms
90th percentile

PG

MetricCohere Rerank 4 FastJina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Latency Metrics
Mean
492ms
1059ms
Average response time
P50
439ms
823ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
650ms
1744ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricCohere Rerank 4 FastJina Reranker v2 Base MultilingualDescription
Latency Metrics
Mean
297ms
671ms
Average response time
P50
297ms
614ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
309ms
825ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more rerankers

See how all reranking models stack up. Compare Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, ZeRank, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect reranker for your RAG application.