Zerank 1 Small vs Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite

Detailed comparison between Zerank 1 Small and Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite. See which reranker best meets your accuracy and performance needs.

Model Comparison

Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite takes the lead.

Both Zerank 1 Small and Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite are powerful reranking models designed to improve retrieval quality in RAG applications. However, their performance characteristics differ in important ways.

Why Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite:

  • Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite delivers better accuracy (nDCG@10: 0.103 vs 0.083)

Overview

Key metrics

ELO Rating

Overall ranking quality

Zerank 1 Small

1556

Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite

1549

Win Rate

Head-to-head performance

Zerank 1 Small

58.6%

Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite

56.5%

Accuracy (nDCG@10)

Ranking quality metric

Zerank 1 Small

0.083

Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite

0.103

Average Latency

Response time

Zerank 1 Small

248ms

Voyage AI Rerank 2.5 Lite

616ms

Visual Performance Analysis

Performance

ELO Rating Comparison

Win/Loss/Tie Breakdown

Accuracy Across Datasets (nDCG@10)

Latency Distribution (ms)

Breakdown

How the models stack up

MetricZerank 1 SmallVoyage AI Rerank 2.5 LiteDescription
Overall Performance
ELO Rating
1556
1549
Overall ranking quality based on pairwise comparisons
Win Rate
58.6%
56.5%
Percentage of comparisons won against other models
Pricing & Availability
Price per 1M tokens
$0.025
$0.020
Cost per million tokens processed
Release Date
2025-07-10
2025-08-11
Model release date
Accuracy Metrics
Avg nDCG@10
0.083
0.103
Normalized discounted cumulative gain at position 10
Performance Metrics
Avg Latency
248ms
616ms
Average response time across all datasets

Dataset Performance

By field

Comprehensive comparison of accuracy metrics (nDCG, Recall) and latency percentiles for each benchmark dataset.

MSMARCO

MetricZerank 1 SmallVoyage AI Rerank 2.5 LiteDescription
Latency Metrics
Mean
217ms
563ms
Average response time
P50
214ms
610ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
227ms
619ms
90th percentile

arguana

MetricZerank 1 SmallVoyage AI Rerank 2.5 LiteDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.279
0.436
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.375
0.496
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.520
0.800
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.820
0.980
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
256ms
636ms
Average response time
P50
254ms
613ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
280ms
819ms
90th percentile

FiQa

MetricZerank 1 SmallVoyage AI Rerank 2.5 LiteDescription
Accuracy Metrics
nDCG@5
0.114
0.111
Ranking quality at top 5 results
nDCG@10
0.124
0.122
Ranking quality at top 10 results
Recall@5
0.098
0.103
% of relevant docs in top 5
Recall@10
0.125
0.135
% of relevant docs in top 10
Latency Metrics
Mean
248ms
639ms
Average response time
P50
244ms
613ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
266ms
819ms
90th percentile

business reports

MetricZerank 1 SmallVoyage AI Rerank 2.5 LiteDescription
Latency Metrics
Mean
251ms
599ms
Average response time
P50
242ms
611ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
298ms
727ms
90th percentile

PG

MetricZerank 1 SmallVoyage AI Rerank 2.5 LiteDescription
Latency Metrics
Mean
287ms
670ms
Average response time
P50
274ms
615ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
345ms
818ms
90th percentile

DBPedia

MetricZerank 1 SmallVoyage AI Rerank 2.5 LiteDescription
Latency Metrics
Mean
226ms
587ms
Average response time
P50
223ms
612ms
50th percentile (median)
P90
241ms
656ms
90th percentile

Explore More

Compare more rerankers

See how all reranking models stack up. Compare Cohere, Jina AI, Voyage, ZeRank, and more. View comprehensive benchmarks, compare performance metrics, and find the perfect reranker for your RAG application.